Sent back exactly 112 trucks… the US continues on the basis of the fight against ISIS (banned in Russia — approx. ed.) continuously delivering assistance to the Kurdistan workers ‘ party (PKK) Party “Democratic Union” (PYD).
In the last column drew the attention of different types of equipment, such as armored humvees, fuel trucks.
I am writing this from the earliest days. The fight against ISIS is used as a tool / lever of the creation of the state of the PKK — PYD. The territory vacated by ISIS, is the PKK. Moreover, some areas ISIS leaves without even a fight. It is no secret that new dress you want to wear the region sew USA…
Let’s look at our country. What is the closest to date, the threat to Turkey? The answer is clear: the terrorist organization PKK…
The PKK, which is in the process of implementation of the notorious “Kurdish initiative” was able to increase the number of fighters and improve their combat capabilities, continues its actions at our borders and inside the country.
Heavy weapons that the United States give Kurdish education in the North of Syria, falls into the hands of the PKK. These weapons uses the PKK against Turkish soldiers…
In the issue of the PKK, the primary threat to Turkey, the US open continues to occupy a subjective position.
Turkey is a NATO member… the United States is the most influential and leading force NATO country NATO openly supports the terrorist organization, which is another NATO country considers a threat to its existence and national security. And protects this organization as its “ground force”!
In this situation, Turkey should change the perception of the threat… you Need to look at the forces behind the PKK… in Addition to USA, the organization has found support in Europe, so, and other countries — members of NATO have no respect for the priorities of Turkey’s national security…
In the period when all this became apparent, on the agenda there was a question about the Turkish defense system. Surfaced before invisible competition Atlantic and Eurasian forces…
Turkey has clearly defined their preferences in this matter and announced its intention to purchase s-400 missiles of the Russian production. After that, some authors began to criticize the choice of Ankara…
Defense system performs the function of a protective shield of the country against any threats from the sky. To ensure national security is not enough to monitor the border; large missiles and medium-range missiles possessed by almost all the developed countries of the world, is a threat to Turkey…
But the main question is: which countries can be dealt a blow to Turkey’s ballistic missiles?
This question can serve as a pretext for all sorts of speculation, so we rephrase it a bit: what countries can’t be dealt a blow to Turkey’s ballistic missiles?
According to our usual sense of security, the member countries of NATO can’t attack Turkey…
But since NATO members are our friends, then why partition of Turkey was not a bit worried about these countries? Why don’t they agree to cooperate with Turkey or the PKK or terrorist organization FETÖ of Fethullah Gulen (Fethulah Gülen)…
I talk with the retired General, strategist Esleem Nejat (Nejat Eslen). He drew attention to the report prepared by the Military Academy of the land forces of the United States, and says: “In U.S. report, notes that Turkey will have inner conflict and in this conflict the us military will intervene”.
Aslan that metaphorically likens the security of Turkey house without a roof, said: “the roof of the us guarantees the defense system”. The United States said: “do Not buy the s-400 Russian production, you will not be able to integrate them into NATO.” Let’s say we bought a system that is compatible with NATO, and these systems will protect us from Iran and Russia… Well, why Russia and Iran are a threat to Turkey? Why do we spend billions of dollars on protection against countries that pose no threat?”
Aslan says we must develop a new understanding of threats to national security in the direction of events in our region. Turkey can get rid of these clutches, without clashing with the West, with rational policy…
Balance policy is possible only with balanced, credible policies… Those who build diplomacy on the heroic rhetoric, will not be able to create an effective national security strategy.
