The problem is not in Drozdiv and Romanenko, a legislative void that lies between them. Voltage mono-linguistic conflict can be removed no dispute or expulsion from the Studio and introducing civilized rules of the game, animirovan the present chaos of efficient and fair law
So who is right — thrushes or Romanenko? A citizen of Ukraine, who knows Ukrainian language, but publicly refuses to speak it — the Amur tiger live throws of a guest for Russian language, and in the next minute passes the word to another Russian-speaking guest?
Maybe those are right who say: it’s all advertising, planned show? After all, dividends received, including the ZIK TV channel, which is in the process of their own “kavitatsii” more and more live provides leading and Russian-speaking guests, but can now get halo principled defender of the native language.
Ostap Drozdov pushing his author program and as host, it is likely that it is now more will to watch, and is always pecking advertisers (including hidden).
Yuri Romanenko increased its own recognition, though put into question his status as an “analyst” is somehow too emotional and unpredictable he behaved in the Studio, and his choice of language could not explain. Not to mention the fact that in recent days this blogger on Facebook managed to write a lot of silly sarcastic posts, which tries not funny to make fun of the Ukrainian language and the idea of Ukrainization.
Then who is right? And no. Stupid situation, shameful behavior; in General similar to the old joke in which two godfather free shit ate. Because the interesting thing in this story — not the position of the Drozdov and Romanenko, and the fact of the quarrel, which became the occasion for another mass srach on language issues.
The problem is not in Drozdiv and Romanenko, a legislative void that lies between them. Voltage mono-linguistic conflict can be removed no dispute or expulsion from the Studio and introducing civilized rules of the game, animirovan the present chaos of efficient and fair law.
Sociologists and political scientists from year to year repeat, that the language issue really does not care about the Ukrainians. First of all, they say, our people are concerned by poverty, the fight against corruption, reforms and so on. At first glance, it is, but really, none of the above problems do not polarize society, as the language.
Because we’re all against poverty, low wages, boorish officials, liparulo power, but in the language question such unanimity does not demonstrate. Someone says that Ukraine would not exist without the Ukrainian language, while others remember that at the front there are Russian-speaking. Starts the discussion that lightning develops into a quarrel, and mainly grows in srach. Fahrion said something, Nicoll threw something, Drozdov someone is expelled and society is heating up again.
Conflicts provoke not Russian-speaking or Ukrainian-speaking citizens as neuregulirovannost relations between them. A law regulating the rights and obligations of speaking in the public sphere — in the store, at school, in ether, in the authority or self — relieve tension and politicization of this topic.
And will not be Patriotic and unpatriotic, “zrad” and “Peremoga” — will be executing the law, and those who violate it. Like for example “Gromadske radio”, which last week was fined for violation of the language quotas for 1751 hryvnia. And you can beat his chest about his patriotism (and tried), democracy, Maidan roots, but if you broke the law — pay the fine, and in case of relapse — say goodbye to your license.
The bill language (5670) is still not passed as Law not due to the fact that the deputies have not agreed on individual provisions and articles. It is not voted because the political forces are interested in how to further manipulate public opinion by using language of conflict. Some patriots protect “MOV”, the other — the language, the spears break, the elections are won.
So I am not for that and not for Romanenko, I — for the language Law, which the conflict between them will decide without me.